Political

Lorenzo Venturini - Resolution on "Providing peace and security in the Caucasus region". If you have any corrections, improvements or suggestions, don't hesitate to contact me. (Or do as I do, and write below!)

Victor Lukash - This are some clauses I did for the political conference on Providing peace and security in the Caucasus region. If you have any suggestions to improve them do so please.

Clauses Forum: Political clauses __1.Urges__ All member states to provide peace troops for the state of Armenia, to prevent further conflict between the states of Armenia and Azerbaijan. __2.Suggests__ for all member states to internationally recognize the independence of Nagorno-Karabak h and to provide it with peace troops, to prevent conflicts between the state of Armenia and Azerbaijan.

or

1.__Urges__ all member states to actively participate in the prevention of further conflict between the states of Armenia and Azerbaijan by taking measures such as but not limited to:  a. providing peace troops for the state of Armenia,  b. internationally recognizing the independence of Nagorno-Karabak h and providing it with peace troops to: i. prevent Azerbaijani troops from moving into the country;

EDIT by Lorenzo: Aha, this is what I did research on! If I hadn't done enough research I would say this is good and the first of the two is the best. Unfortunately, I know exactly why these measures wouldn't work. There is no need for peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh because fighting has stopped. Peacekeepers are only sent if there is a a) massacre b) genocide c) lot of oil or something like that. There is none of that there, and so it is better to negotiate directly with Armenia and Azerbaijan to make a workable peace treaty. And to recognize the independence of Nagorno-Karabakh would be very, very wrong from a MUN preparation point of view and a geopolitics point of view. First, your country has not recognized Nagorno-Karabakh and therefore it can't call for the implementation of something that it hasn't done itself. Second, there are many good reasons not to recognize Nagorno-Karabakh. First, it puts pressure on Azerbaijan and Armenia to sign a peace treaty. Second, it means that you have good relations with Azerbaijan (saying it doesn't own some of its territory is not very popular). Third, Nagorno-Karabakh hasn't been pressuring you to recognize it or anything like that, so you have no reason to say that.